Thursday 31 January 2013

Twitter Ranked Fastest Growing Social Platform In The World

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...
Google and Facebook each should have acquired Twitter, but they did not. Now, GlobalWebIndex has the Twitter racehorse solidly in the lead. This is no neck-in-neck race. Twitter raced ahead when heads were turned. An incredible 21% of the global internet population now use Twitter actively on a monthly basis.
Every quarter, GlobalWebIndex produces a new report. This one: GWI.8 is for Q4 2012 and it shows that the number of active Twitter users grew 40% from Q2 2012 to Q4 2012. This is equal to 288 million monthly active users (claimed to have used or contribute to Twitter in the past month) across the 31 markets currently researched by GWI (representing nearly 90% of the global internet population aged 16 to 65). That marks a whopping growth rate in active users of 714% since July 2009.

 
Can you say, I mean tweet, Wow?
Hong Kong led the growth of active usage, but the USA grew a “staggering” 94 percent in second place. It was followed by Russia, China, Italy, and South Korea. You’ll have to visit the blog post to see the next 15 or so on their list. Impressive. Read the full post from Tom at GlobalWebIndex: Twitter Now The Fastest Growing Social Platform In The World.
The GWI analysts have identified three key reasons behind this growth for the U.S.:
  • Mobile Devices: The US for many years was a mobile internet laggard, but in 2012 active mobile internet usage expanded from 37% to 43% of US internet users and tablet from 8% to 18%. Also as 31% of US mobile users are now on an iOS device, deep Twitter integration into iOS was a game changer (as reflected in the mobile growth above).
  • Older Demographics: : Over-55s are the fastest growing demographic on Twitter! Active usage grew 116% between Q2 and Q4 2012 while active usage among 45-54s increased 81% in the same period. Twitter proved to be the fastest growing social platform in the latter demographic group. In an aging population, this represents tens of millions of well-healed users on Twitter.
This deserves the exclamation point the analysts placed in the first sentence. And you thought the over-55s were only buying iPhone 5s (based on that Samsung television commercial humor).
  • Mass Media Integration: TV, films, radio, sports and advertising provided Twitter with an incredible level of exposure, and this is already translating into more users. This integration has provided people with reasons to use Twitter that go well beyond social.
If you want the full report, you can visit the GlobalWebIndex report page where you can purchase the Social Engagement Benchmark 2012 as well as other reports.

Source: www.forbes.com

Wednesday 30 January 2013

78 bodies found 'executed' in Syria river

ALEPPO, Syria - The bodies of 78 young men, all executed with a single gunshot, were found Tuesday in a river in Aleppo city, adding to the grim list of massacres committed during Syria's 22-month conflict.
The gruesome discovery came ahead of a briefing by peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi to the UN Security Council on the uprising, which the United Nations says has left more than 60,000 people dead.
Abu Seif, a rebel fighter, said 78 bodies were retrieved from the Quweiq River and that 30 more were still in the waters but out of reach because of regime snipers.
"The regime threw them into the river so that they would arrive in an area under our control, so the people would think we killed them," he said.
But a security official accused "terrorists," the regime term for the rebels, of the killings, adding the victims were residents kidnapped from the opposition-held district of Bustan al-Qasr.
Their families had tried to negotiate their release before they were killed overnight, he said.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but the official SANA news agency said the jihadist Al-Nusra Front carried out the executions.
"Terrorist groups from Al-Nusra Front in Aleppo carried out a mass execution of dozens of abducted people and threw their bodies in the Quweiq River," the agency said.
Al-Nusra, which first gained notoriety for its suicide bombings in Syria, has evolved into a formidable fighting force leading attacks on battlefronts throughout the embattled country.
Its extremist tactics and suspected affiliation to the Al-Qaeda offshoot in Iraq have landed it on the US list of terrorist organisations.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights gave a toll of 65 bodies but warned the figure could rise significantly.
"They are in their 20s and were executed by a bullet to the head. Most of them had their hands tied behind their backs and were in civilian clothes," said the watchdog.
The scene on the banks of the Quweiq was grim, as muddied corpses are dredged out and hundreds of distressed people flocked around to see if they could spot among the bodies a father, a brother, a son or a husband.
"My brother disappeared weeks ago when he was crossing (through) the regime-held zone, and we don't know where he is or what has become of him," said Mohammed Abdel Aziz.
Volunteers helped place the bodies on a truck. They were then taken to a school where they were laid out and covered.
"We do not know who they are -- they were not carrying papers," a volunteer said as an AFP correspondent counted at least 15 bodies on one truck.
A number was placed next to each body and their faces were left uncovered to allow the identification by relatives at the school, where the nauseating stench of death lingered.
"There are those who drowned because the were shot in the legs or abdomen before being thrown into the water," said a nurse, noting some may have been killed up to three days ago.
Violence raged elsewhere in Aleppo province, where seven children were killed in air strikes on the town of Safireh, the Observatory said, giving a toll of 91 people killed across Syria on Tuesday.
And in Damascus a member of parliament was seriously injured when a explosive device strapped to his car exploded, the Observatory said.
The bloodshed came as rebels captured a vital bridge across the Euphrates River in Deir Ezzor city, largely severing an army supply route to Hasakeh province further north.
The nearby regime security headquarters and a smaller bridge were also captured, prompting retaliatory air strikes on the critical crossings.
"These gains in Deir Ezzor are very important because this strategic city is the gateway to a region rich in oil and gas resources," said Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman.
"If the rebels continue to progress and gain control of what is left of military-held positions... it will be the first major city to fall into the hands of the rebels," said Abdel Rahman.
On the eve of a donors' conference in Kuwait, charity organisations pledged $182 million (136 million euros) for Syrians displaced at home or who have fled abroad.
US President Barack Obama announced an extra $155 million dollars to aid refugees fleeing what he said was "barbarism" propagated by the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Source: abs-cbnnews.com

Saturday 26 January 2013

Apple loses world's most valuable company crown


Apple shares extended their losses Friday, ending a miserable week for the California tech giant as it surrendered its position as the world's biggest company based on market value.
Apple ended down 2.36 percent at $439.88, giving it a market capitalization of $413 billion, while oil giant ExxonMobil rose 0.36 percent to $91.68 with a market cap of $418 billion to edge into first place.
Apple first overtook ExxonMobil in August 2011 as the most valuable company in the world based on the value of its stock.
A year later, Apple dethroned longtime rival Microsoft as the most valuable company in history based on the value of its stock at $622 billion.
But the company took a bruising this week after a gloomy forecast accompanying its record quarterly profit announcement prompted pessimism over the tech giant's slowing growth trajectory.
Apple's profit was $13.1 billion on revenue of $54.5 billion in the fiscal quarter that ended on December 29, with sales of iPhones and iPads setting quarterly highs.
But despite those figures, investors soured on Apple after it forecast that revenue for the current quarter would range from $41-43 billion and that it would have a gross margin of 37.5 to 39.5 percent, lower than expectations.
Analysts remained cautious about Apple, which had seen a meteoric rise last September to over $700 a share but slid 37 percent since then. The company shed some $60 billion on Thursday and around $10 billion more Friday.
Some express concern that Apple has lost its edge in innovation since the death of co-founder Steve Jobs, and is losing ground to rivals such as Samsung, which leads the mobile phone market, and to others using Google's Android operating system.
Jinho Cho at Mirae Asset Securities said Apple will likely increase carrier subsidies in 2013 and launch an "entry-level" iPhone to compete better in emerging markets.
"These moves by Apple should lead to stiffer competition for greater carrier subsidies among smartphone makers, thus driving down handset industry-wide operating margins," the analyst said.
Getting into smartphone price wars would break from Apple's long tradition of premium products aimed at the high end of the market and bite into profit made from each device sold.
"While we are incrementally more positive on the stock, we also mention that competition is increasing for the company," Colin Gillis at BGC Financial said in a research note.
"We see competitors are using price as a lever to get traction in the market. Apple may also run into difficulty posting both the volumes and maintaining its prices over the next several quarters."
Investors are also known for letting emotion influence stock trading decisions.
Late co-founder Jobs was a maestro at dazzling the world by over-delivering on innovations and blinding people to slips.
Since the death of Jobs last year, Apple has fallen short of high expectations for Siri artificial intelligence software for iPhones and smartphone mapping software so flawed that the company apologized.
Apple meanwhile released an update to an ongoing audit of working conditions at facilities in China.
"We're fixing problems and tackling issues that our entire industry faces, such as excessive work hours and underage labor," the report said.
"We're going deeper into the supply chain than any other company we know of, and we're reporting at a level of detail that is unparalleled in our industry."
Apple tracks work hours for more than a million workers across its supply chain and publishes results monthly at its website.
The company reported a 92 percent compliance rate with keeping work weeks to 60 hours or less last year, with the average number of hours worked in a week being less than 50.
Eight facilities were found to have bonded labor. Suppliers had to pay back $6.4 million in foreign contract worker fees and implement procedures to make sure the practice was stopped, Apple indicated.
Eleven facilities were found to have underage workers.
One supplier used dozens of underage workers backed with forged documents, prompting Apple to cut its business relationship and make the company send the children back to school and finance their educations, according to the report.


Russia backs nationwide 'anti-gay' bill

MOSCOW - Russia's parliament has given initial backing to a bill banning homosexual "propaganda" among children that could lead to gays being fined for demonstrating or kissing in public, a move condemned by the United States and rights groups.
The 388-1 vote in the first of three readings Friday came hours after police detained more than 20 mostly young opponents who were staging a "kiss-in" protest outside the building of the State Duma lower house.
The nationwide proposal is the latest in a rapid sequence of restrictive legislation voted through by parliament since President Vladimir Putin returned to power last year in the face of wide-scale protests.
The ruling party bill is based on local laws already passed in Putin's native city of Saint Petersburg and five other Russian regions, and aims to shield Russians aged up to 18 from what its authors view as dangerous ideas on freedoms spread by Western-backed advocates and social media.
"Just look at what is happening in Spain. Just look at what is happening in France! Of course we need this law," said ruling United Russia deputy Dmitry Sablin.
In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said: "We are deeply concerned by this draft legislation in Russia that severely restricts freedom of expression and assembly for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals and, indeed, for all Russians."
London-based group Amnesty International also condemned the proposed law, with David Diaz-Jogeix, deputy director of the Europe and Central Asia program, saying: "This law is an attack on the right to freedom of expression.
"There is no legal definition in the Russian law of what constitutes ‘propaganda of homosexuality' and the law could be interpreted very loosely.
"They are going to punish people for something which is perfectly legitimate -- expressing themselves, being themselves."
Outside the Duma Friday, a group of opponents embraced and kissed their same-sex partners in defiance of the bill's proposals, their third such action there in a week. Once again, police moved in to break up the protest.
Witnesses said officers detained 20 supporters and opponents of the bill as small scuffles broke out.
Homosexuality was only decriminalized in Russia after the end of the Soviet era and top officials continue to express homophobic views in public.
Russia's leaders repeatedly refer to gays in official language as "people of a non-traditional sexual orientation".
The Moscow authorities have broken up attempts to stage gay rights parades over the past seven years.
And a 2010 survey by the Levada Centre found that 74 percent of respondents thought homosexuality was either "immoral" or "mentally deficient".
The bill in its current form prohibits "the propaganda of homosexual behavior among minors" and sets out fines for violations of up to 5,000 rubles ($165) for individuals and up to 50,000 rubles for officials.
Legal entities such as businesses or schools would be fined up to 500,000 rubles ($16,500).
The introduction of a local law in Saint Petersburg last year led to a boycott of the former imperial capital by international gay rights groups while US pop star Madonna handed out pink ribbons at a concert in the city.
The authorities have issued a series of fines against couples who appeared in public kissing or holding hands.
United Russia has enough votes in the lower house to pass any piece of legislation on its own without consulting the other parties. But Communists and other lawmakers have also expressed sympathy with the draft.
Russian state television said members of Russia's gay and lesbian community would be invited to attend the key second hearing that is likely to be held within the next few weeks.
Draft laws move from the Duma to the upper house for a single reading before reaching Putin's desk.

Source: www.abs-cbnnews.com by Agence France-Presse

Wednesday 23 January 2013

Facebook Graph Search Shows You 'Married People Who Like Prostitutes' And 'Employers Of People Who Like Racism'

When Facebook launched its social search engine “Graph Search” last week, I suggested that Facebook stalking would now be limited only by users’ creativity in coming up with search queries. Well, congratulations to Tom Scott who has won the creativity prize with his Tumblr, Actual Facebook Graph Searches. He’s posting and crowd-sourcing a series of searches that surface potentially embarrassing, hypocritical, threatening or unsavory information about Facebook users, such as:
  • “Current employers of people who like Racism”
  • “Spouses of married people who like [cheat-on-your-partner dating site] Ashley Madison”
  • “Family members of people who live in China and like [the very very banned] Falun Gong”
  • “Islamic men interested in men who live in Tehran, Iran”
  • “People who like Focus on the Family [anti gay marriage] and Neil Patrick Harris [very gay and due to be married with kids]”
  • “Single women who live nearby and who are interested in men and like Getting Drunk”
  • “Mothers of Catholics from Italy who like Durex”
There is no private information unintentionally exposed here. It isn’t as Gizmodo quipped in a post last week that “people are now sharing horrible things about themselves thanks to Facebook Search.” They were already sharing these things. These are simply interesting juxtapositions of public information that was previously harder to access and display. For example, one could have gone to the public “Racism” page and looked at a list of everyone who liked it (hopefully ironically) and then looked through their profiles to figure out who their employers were, but it involved more steps. Facebook has simply done what any good tech company should do — remove those onerous steps and make it much easier to find out who’s racist, who’s cheating, who wants to get drunk tonight, or, perhaps best of all, all of the above.

The exposure of this information in this form isn’t a matter of private information being breached; instead it’s a matter of obscurity being reduced — a differentiation well explored by Woodrow Harzog and Evan Sellinger in The Atlantic. Increasingly, in this age of big data, better search tools, and ease of posting information, we’re encountering more and more often discomfort around the idea of public data being made more public, as a New York newspaper discovered when it put public information about who had guns into an interactive map. Lots of people shot off about that one, including lawmakers, leading the newspaper to take down the map.
Tumblr creator Tom Scott realizes the issue isn’t explicitly a privacy one.
“I’m not sure I’m making any deeper point about privacy: I think, at this point, we’re basically all just rubbernecking – myself included,” says Scott by email. “Facebook does have good privacy settings: but there are many, many people who don’t know how to use them!”

That is a problem, and one that Graph Search could potentially help solve by demonstrating to people how public much of their content really is if they haven’t fooled around with their privacy settings.
“People are confused about their settings. Facebook has changed them so many times. If you haven’t locked down your privacy settings before, you should do it now,” says consumer privacy expert Justin Brookman of the Center for Democracy and Technology. “There’s a lagging awareness as to whether information should be public in the first place. The positive result of all this, though, is that people are becoming less and less stupid about information sharing. We’re catching up and we’re getting better.”
Though some people, like Ryan Tate of Wired, will likely want to share more because of Graph, because it just became a much more useful vehicle for searching for information about venues, restaurants, and vacation spots.
Another problem with all this is the expectation we bring to the data. We’re looking at these results as if all of this information is accurate, and that’s almost certainly wrong.
“There’s the fact that Facebook ‘likes’ and profile settings aren’t necessarily accurate reflections of reality,” writes Will Oremus at Slate. As commenter Julie Popp remarked on my last Facebook article in a seemingly endless series about the downsides of ‘Liking’:
A common joke among the males (especially freshman year) in a group of friends was to hack each others’ Facebook accounts when they left their computer unattended. Then the hacker would “like” incredible amounts of things that were usually funny, opposite of the victim’s political views, really awful boy bands or romantic comedies. It was all in good jest.
It’s all fun and games until your friend’s photo winds up on Gizmodo’s front page

Source: www.forbes.com by Kashmir Hill

Saturday 19 January 2013

Algeria hostage crisis ends in bloodbath



IN AMENAS, Algeria - Algerian troops stormed a remote gas plant Saturday to end a hostage crisis that killed 23 foreigners and Algerians, seven of them executed by their Islamist captors in a final military assault.
Twenty-one hostages died during the siege that began when the Al-Qaeda-linked gunmen attacked the In Amenas facility deep in the Sahara desert at dawn on Wednesday, the interior ministry said.
Thirty-two kidnappers were also killed, and special forces were able to free "685 Algerian workers and 107 foreigners," it said.
Among the dead were an unknown number of foreigners -- including from Britain, France, Romania and the United States -- and many were still unaccounted for, including Japanese.
The kidnappers led by Algerian Mokhtar Belmokhtar, a former Al-Qaeda commander in North Africa, killed two people on a bus, a Briton and an Algerian, before taking hundreds of workers hostage when they overran the gas plant.
Belmokhtar's "Signatories in Blood" group had been demanding an end to French military intervention against jihadists in neighbouring Mali.
In Saturday's assault, "the Algerian army took out 11 terrorists, and the terrorist group killed seven foreign hostages," state television said, without giving a breakdown of their nationalities.
A security official who spoke to AFP as army helicopters overflew the plant gave the same death tolls, adding it was believed the foreigners were executed "in retaliation".
As experts began to clear the complex of bombs planted by the Islamists, residents of In Amenas breathed a collective sigh of relief.
"We went from a peaceful situation to a terror situation," said one resident who gave his name as Fouad.
"The plant could have exploded and taken out the town," said another.
Brahim Zaghdaoui said he was not surprised by the Algerian army's ruthless final assault.
"It was predictable that it would end like that," he said standing outside the town's hospital, where coffins were seen arriving in the morning.
Most of the hostages had been freed on Thursday when Algerian forces launched a rescue operation, which was widely condemned as hasty.
But French President Francois Hollande and US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta refused to blame Algeria.
The response by Algiers was "the most appropriate" given it was dealing with "coldly determined terrorists ready to kill their hostages," said Hollande.
Panetta added: "They are in the region, they understand the threat from terrorism... I think it's important that we continue to work with (Algiers) to develop a regional approach."
British Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said the crisis had been "brought to an end by a further assault by Algerian forces, which has resulted in further loss of life".
The deaths were "appalling and unacceptable and we must be clear that it is the terrorists who bear sole responsibility for it," he said.
The hostage-taking was the largest since the 2008 Mumbai attack, and the biggest by jihadists since hundreds were killed in a Moscow theatre in 2002 and at a school in the Russian town of Beslan in 2004, according to monitoring group IntelCenter.
Foreign Secretary William Hague said a total of six British nationals and one resident of the United Kingdom were either dead or unaccounted for.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan said he had received "severe information" about 10 of his country's nationals who were still missing.
The gunmen said on Friday that they were still holding "seven foreign hostages" -- three Belgians, two Americans, one Japanese and a Briton.
However, Brussels said it had no indication any of its nationals were being held.
Algeria was strongly criticised for launching Thursday's assault, which the kidnappers said had left dead 34 of the hostages and 15 of their own fighters.
Belmokhtar also wanted to exchange American hostages for the blind Egyptian sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman and Pakistani Aafia Siddiqui, jailed in the United States on charges of terrorist links.
At least one American had already been confirmed dead before Saturday's assault.
But the State Department said "the United States does not negotiate with terrorists".
France, which said on Saturday that 2,000 of the 2,500 troops it had pledged were now on the ground in Mali, said that no more of its citizens were being held.
President Hollande said French troops would stay in Mali as long as is needed "to defeat terrorism" in the West African country and its neighbours.
Algerian news agency APS quoted a government official as saying the kidnappers, who claimed to have come from Niger, were armed with machineguns, assault rifles, rocket launchers and missiles.
This was confirmed by an Algerian driver, Iba El Haza, who said the hostage-takers spoke in different Arabic dialects and perhaps also in English.
"From their accents I understood one was Egyptian, one Tunisian, another Algerian and one was speaking English or (another) foreign language," Haza told AFP after escaping on Thursday.
"The terrorists said: 'You have nothing to do with this, you are Algerians and Muslims. We won't keep you, we only want the foreigners.'"

Source: abs-cbnnews.com by Amal Belalloufi, Agence France-Presse

Saturday 12 January 2013

Samsung's Bendable Phone Could Break Apple's Innovation Hegemony



Gadget aficionados,  get used to the name ‘Youm.’  Youm is the name of a new technology developed by Samsung that incorporates organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays.
This technology produces displays that are flexible and bendable.  Samsung claims that the displays will be nearly unbreakable.
At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Samsung showed a prototype device incorporating Youm.  The screen on the device extended to the edge of the device so that if the device was put flat on a table with the cover on it, the edge would still display an incoming text or email. Samsung also brought in Microsoft (MSFT) to display a Windows Phone prototype incorporating Youm. One inference is that the first phone Samsung introduces using Youm will be a Windows Phone and not a phone based on Google (GOOG) Android.  It is conceivable that Nokia (NOK) may be close behind Samsung in incorporating similar technology.
Samsung is not the only one with OLED technology, but Samsung is believed to be the most advanced and closest to bringing flexible, bendable and unbreakable OLED screens in mass produced phones and tablets. There is even a rumor that Galaxy SIV, the upcoming successor to the popular Galaxy SIII, will include an OLED display.  We have no independent confirmation of this rumor.
Apple (AAPL) is believed to be far behind Samsung in OLED technology.
Ordinary LEDs were introduced in 1962.  The work that forms the basis of OLEDs was done in 1960, but widespread commercial applications of OLED technology have come to fruition only within the last two years.  DuPont (DD) has played a key role in the development of OLED technology.
Traditionally it has been difficult to mass produce OLEDs.  Further OLEDs structures are inherently unstable.  OLEDs were also limited by the life span of organic materials that transferred light.  For example historically materials used in blue OLEDs had a life span of 14,000 hours to half original brightness, compared to 40,000 hours for traditional LEDs.
Traditional OLEDs also suffered from color balance deficiencies.  Materials used for the blue color deteriorated more rapidly than the materials used for other colors.  Since most displays of today use only three colors red, green, and blue, this color imbalance issue has been a serious problem.  OLEDs have also suffered from screen burn in issues, not dissimilar to plasma displays.  Certain OLED materials also are damaged by prolonged exposure to sunlight.
Samsung appears to have overcome the foregoing problems.
Apple’s lag in this technology goes back to the days of Steve Jobs.  In 2010 at the Apple World Wide Developers Conference, Jobs touted Retina Display, which relies on traditional silicon LED technology.  Jobs said, “You can’t make an OLED display with this resolution, we think it is quite superior.”
Samsung’s advances in this technology have the potential to seriously hurt Apple as Samsung is believed to control up to 90% of the supply of OLED displays.  Samsung may choose not to supply Youm displays to Apple or in the alternate supply such displays to Apple at inflated prices.  Either way this is potentially a very negative development for Apple.

Source: www.forbes.com by Nigam Arora